Monday, August 29, 2011

Never mind the eggs, give hens a break!

Damn egg farmers.

I have no problem with people eating eggs. I don't particularly like their taste, but I understand their function in a diet. Furthermore, I don't think the chickens mind all that much if we eat them. However, what does bug me is battery farming, where hens spend their lives in a space roughly the size of a piece of paper, with no room to stretch their wings or lie down, cranking out their goods until they're too old to produce at which point they're sold off to American school lunch programs to be blended into paste and served to second graders. 

Admittedly, we do the same thing to humans. It's called college and it's not quite as bad because it typically only last four years and you get all the cheap beer you can drink.

So, while I may indulge in the occasional Keystone Light for nostalgia's sake, I'm incredibly vigilant about eating organic, free-range eggs. Admittedly, the USDA's definition of "free-range" can be manipulated by unscrupulous farmers, but I see it as a step in the right direction. As for "organic," I know the farming industry distorts the term way too much, but when it comes to livestock, it's super important. Battery farming is incredibly stressful on the chickens. So stressful, in fact, that they have a habit of dying unless they're hopped up on antibiotics and hormones. Considering humans grossly abuse antibiotics and 80% of the antibiotics we use go to farm animals, it's obvious math that saving a buck or two on a dozen antibiotic-laden eggs will eventually lead to the eradication of our species via some monster, antibiotic-busting, super bacteria.

If they're organic, all those antibiotics and hormones are off limits.

But the first step to this is getting them out of those damn cages - and the poultry farmers of America don't want this to happen, which is why their little PR group, the American Egg Board, sent out this obnoxiously misleading press release last week:
New study finds no nutritional difference between free-range and cage-produced eggs
CHAMPAIGN, IL (August 26, 2011) – Eggs produced by free-range hens are often perceived by the public to be nutritionally superior to eggs obtained from layers kept in traditional battery cages. However, a recent scientific study has called this popular perception into question by finding essentially no differences in the nutritional quality of eggs produced by hens from both management systems, said the Poultry Science Association (PSA).
So many things wrong here. First off, it's a lie. So much of a lie, in fact, that the release admits it 5 paragraphs later by explaining "β-carotene levels were higher in the range eggs, which... may have contributed to the darker colored yolks observed in these eggs during the study."

Huh? How do "no nutritional difference" and "β-carotene levels were higher" mesh? The study indicates  vitamin A levels in both types of eggs were the same, yet β-carotene can be converted into Vitamin A in our body, so technically, the body gets more A from the free-range eggs.

Then, if you go to the actual study in Poultry Science (a publication, incredibly, that has been around since 1908, outliving both Life Magazine and the Weekly World News. How do they do it?), you'll see that the slightly higher fat levels in free-range eggs that the press release dismissively mentions translate to said eggs having more unsaturated fat, including omega-3 fatty acids. Granted, it's a minimal amount, but omega-3s are an essential nutrient that many Americans don't get enough of, so every little bit counts.

And press release aside, the study is rather flawed for a couple reasons. First, while the eggs were tested for cholesterol, n-3 fatty acids, saturated fat, monounsaturated fat, polyunsaturated fat, β-carotene, vitamin A, and vitamin E, they were not tested for vitamin D or any of the B vitamins present in eggs. Also untested were calcium, iron, selenium or any of the other minerals that make eggs a healthy nutritional option.

Second, all the animals were given the exact, same diet. One of the points of letting chickens go free range is that you can give them a healthier diet. If the tiny nutritional changes I mentioned about came from hens eating the exact, same food, imagine what would happen with better food?

I'd like to see this study done with free-range, organic, antibiotic-free farming versus doped-up battery farming. But if that happens, fat chance of the eggheads at the Egg Board writing about it.

21 comments:

  1. I appreciate your review on this article.. However, since I do research with carotenoids (such as B-carotene) just couldn't let this go without commenting. B-carotene can be converted into Vitamin A in our body. B-carotene does not promote Vitamin A absorption. Just wanted to clarify that.

    100% agree that the conclusions from this study are grossly overstated. Sad to see poor science published.

    ReplyDelete
  2. Shoot. Thank you for clarifying that. I'm stoked to know I have readers of your caliber.

    I'm going to correct my mistake in the article, but leave these comments.

    ReplyDelete
  3. Oh good article. It's only cage free organic for me....been that way for a while. Locally we have Weathertop Farm that uses portable enclosures they move to a different spot on the pasture each day...so the hens are protected from predators but get to eat their natural diet and move around.

    http://weathertopfarm.com/id17.html

    ReplyDelete
  4. Eggs from pastured hens given organic feed only as a supplement (meaning they get their primary nutrition from greens, bugs, and whatever else chickens evolved to eat): even better.

    ReplyDelete
  5. Just become a pure vegetarian or espouse veganism and don't eat the eggs at all. There are plenty of plant-based alternatives which have all the qualities of eggs without dealing with any of this.

    ReplyDelete
  6. Great info, thanks! I believe you may have possibly meant to write "chance" instead of "change" in the last sentence. Keep up the great work.

    ReplyDelete
  7. well there is the quality of the egg, but look back at the picture... there is the quality of the life of the chicken. Obviously the industry does not give a crap about it, but for me, it counts. So all nutritions equal, i still prefer to think it comes from a chicken that has some space.

    ReplyDelete
  8. speaking of quality of life, shall we not forget about all the other animals and mammals that humans farm to feed themselves? and we are humane?

    ReplyDelete
  9. I don't eat eggs,but my mom is lucky enough to have 2 healthy,beautiful chickens that eat very healthy and are free! Guess what they produce the most beautiful eggs and my son enjoys the dozen she gives us!

    ReplyDelete
  10. Excellent article! I am glad I am more informed now. I eat organic as much as I can, especially eggs. I never knew why consuming foods with antibiotics was bad, and I'm glad you've clarified that for me. Wow, being informed can be alarming, yet relieving.

    ReplyDelete
  11. very good review of the article and about the facts that the study doesn't tell you rather what it tries to convince.

    ReplyDelete
  12. My wife and I are currently doing research on building our own coop and acquiring some chickens. We know the health benefits of free range, no hormone/antibiotic animals. We have been getting our free range, organic eggs from a local farmer and hope to start getting all of our meat from the same types of sources.

    ReplyDelete
  13. guess how much stress hormones chickens put into those eggs ... organic farming ought to be the rule not the exception ....

    ReplyDelete
  14. We've been buying our free range organic eggs from an Amish farmer in PA. Lots of room for the happy chickens to run around! Happy animals make delicious food. We are also lucky enough to get all grassfed beef and...raw milk!(controversial, I know, but delicious just the same) It is more money than shopping at the local grocery mill, but literally worth every penny for the health benefits and clear conscience! The larger point is to know where your food comes from, visit the farm and see the animals.

    ReplyDelete
  15. You know? I have watched food Inc but really didn't change my ways... You sir may have just convinced me to switch to free range eggs. The antibiotics scares me, truth be told.

    I wonder though what it would take to get a study going like the one you described in the end. Part of the problem is the big industry is generally the one who funds these things and even the government is reluctant to fund something that could really damage American "business"

    ReplyDelete
  16. I'm not as scientifically savvy as most of those who posted, but I must say it makes me sick about the lies we are told! Our government and regulators (FDA, EPA, private companies) are in bed together and the public has no idea! Those who try to tell the truth are shut up or paid off. Keep reporting the truth, my friend; we all need to hear it in order to make a difference!!

    ReplyDelete
  17. Gross, unjust, inhumane, worshipping the God of green and not of green earth and healthy foot print, turns the stomach. These images should be posted, splattered (no pun) and circulated everywhere, then lets see what happens ...? Bless your injury and divine energy work with the ?surgeons' hands.

    ReplyDelete
  18. Battery farmers sicken me and should be caged as well! Those poor hens lead a depressing, inhumane short life. I read that most do not survive past 10 months as their little bones become so brittle and break due to lack of movement. I had been buying organic free range egg for years but decided I wasn't 100% convinced that they were free range, so last summer my family started a small flock of our own. We have 8 HAPPY and HEALTHY hens that live a normal cage free life. We enjoy eating their delicious eggs without a shadow of a doubt of where they came from and and if they were treated humanely. I encourage each of you to try it! Yes, ONE BY ONE WE CAN MAKE A DIFFERENCE!

    ReplyDelete
  19. I know I am months too late to really be commenting on this, but press releases like this really get my (free range) goat. My perspective is that of an egg loving carnivore who doesn't usually buy free range anything in particular, but I am going to start, NOW, after seeing those cages. Here is my commentary on the press release:

    CHAMPAIGN, IL (August 26, 2011) – Eggs produced by free-range hens are often perceived by the public to be nutritionally superior to eggs obtained from layers kept in traditional battery cages

    **I'm not sure that that is the case, and this is a sweeping generalization; their first principle here is flawed and is a straw man argument. They should be flogged**

    . However, a recent scientific study has called this popular perception into question by finding essentially no differences in the nutritional quality of eggs produced by hens from both management systems, said the Poultry Science Association (PSA).

    **Your comments on this above are interesting. Not to mention that free range eggs that I have had are better tasting. But that is opinion**

    Here is something that really annoys me:
    ...kept in traditional battery cages...

    Here the implied contrast is [those crazy upstart silly free range farmers] vs. [we traditional, just like mom used to make, apple pie loving, Ford driving poultry farmers]. Traditional is an emotional word that often implies "good" or "accepted" or even "beloved". They are setting their language up to make you feel better about "battery cages".

    One look at those battery cages makes me want to go off my feed. Then the "battery cages" are referred to as a "management system" as opposed to a moral choice, which is really the issue here.

    I have no problem with eating animals. I have no problem with farming them. And I recognize that being farmed sometimes is
    not convenient for the animals. But farming need not be grossly cruel.

    I'll have to think on how this affects my overall decisions about the way I buy food.

    Thank you, Upton Sinclair.

    ReplyDelete
  20. That picture is deceiving, in fact. Those pictured are in transit, not in a housing or breeding facility. Like people, stressed chickens don't lay eggs, period. I've had chickens all my life: you scare or rattle a hen, you are not getting eggs for a couple of days.
    PETA is not a great resource from which to be pulling information. They are a lobbying, political group. Their actions are borderline terrorist, and their ads are sensationalized and over-hyped.
    The best resource for this article would be a professor of poultry science at any land-grant university.
    Also, for your information, the USDA considers the handling of poultry to be "good commercial practices," not "humane handling," reserved for red meat. This unfortunate loophole does allow for less than favorable treatment, but, as was stated earlier, stressed animals don't produce.
    There are many hard-working factory farmers and growers with the quality of their product being their highest priority. I challenge you all to seek these companies, via research, and support them. The Earth is not big enough or rich enough to justify the whole world eating organic.

    ReplyDelete